The incredible complexity of organic life is seen by some as evidence that life was designed by an intelligent creator.

Talking Points:

  • Biologists can explain how cells work, not how organic life originated. The former is a question of laboratory tests, the latter is a thesis that is viewed as consistent with data we have, not on actual observed facts.
  • The lines aren’t as clear as some people suggest. It’s often assumed by hardcore atheists that you either believe in science or you are a fool! Some scientists are not so convinced, but feel pressured to comply to go along with accepted norms.
  • The basic building blocks of life are too complex to have arisen by chance.
Discussion:
  1. Initial reactions to this topic? What jumped out at you?
  2. Would you describe yourself as a “skeptic” of Christianity? If so, what makes you skeptical?
  3. Read Hebrews 11:6. What does it mean that it is impossible to please God without faith? How is this scripture relevant to conversations about science and God?
  4. Many Christians study medicine and science and have come to radically different conclusions about the origin of life than non-believers studying the same or similar fields. What are some takeaways from this fact?
  5. Do you think Dr. Koehler is correct to suggest that the complexity of life evidences an intelligent creator? Why or why not?
  6. “Good science will always point back to God.” Explain why you agree or disagree with this statement.
  7. Is there a step you need to take based on today’s topic?

[External Resource: How does DNA point to the existence of a Creator?]

[External Resource: What is the difference between Microevolution and Macroevolution?]

[Related: Creation Gives Evidence of God]